Past adoption experiences
Past adoption experiences
During the early 1960s and 1970s in particular, adoption was prevalent in Australia. Single women who were pregnant were encouraged - or forced - to "give up" their babies for adoption.
The shame and silence that surrounded pregnancy outside marriage meant that these women were viewed as “unfit” mothers. The practices at the time, called “closed adoption”, were seen as the solution.
“Closed adoption” involved an adopted child’s original birth certificate being sealed forever, and an amended birth certificate issued that established the child’s new identity and relationship with their adoptive family.
Recent research at the Australian Institute of Family Studies aimed to improve knowledge about the extent and effects of past adoption practices, and to strengthen the evidence available to governments to address the current needs of individuals affected by closed adoption.
The AIFS study surveyed 1,528 individuals affected by closed adoption, including:
- 823 adopted persons;
- 505 mothers;
- 94 adoptive parents;
- 94 other family members; and
- 12 fathers.
The findings of the study reveal that the long-term effects of past adoption practices cannot be understated.
Mothers1 in the study described a range of areas where their experience of adoption continue to affect them now, including:
- the birth process;
- differential treatment from married mothers;
- experiences of abuse by hospital and/or maternity home staff;
- administration of drugs that impaired their capacity;
- lack of ability to give or revoke consent;
- not being listened to; and
- being made to feel unworthy or incapable of parenting, particularly from authority figures.
The research also found that close to one-third of the mothers showed a likelihood of having a severe psychological disorder at the time of survey completion, and over half reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Persons who were adopted
The majority of the adopted participants described experiencing problems with attachment, identity, abandonment and the parenting of their own children.
The adoptees reported lower levels of wellbeing and higher levels of psychological distress compared to the general population, and almost 70% of these respondents agreed that being adopted had resulted in some level of negative effect on their health and wellbeing while growing up. These negative effects included:
- hurt from secrecy and lies surrounding their adoption and subsequent sense of betrayal;
- identity problems;
- feelings of abandonment;
- feeling obligated to show gratitude throughout their lives;
- low levels of self-worth; and
- difficulties in forming attachments to others.
Many adoptees also continue to face significant barriers to finding information about their families of origin.
Although the number of fathers who responded to the survey was too low to make generalisations, almost all of those that did participate showed some signs of post-traumatic stress.
The lack of consultation and involvement in the decision at the time of the pregnancy and birth of their child was highlighted as being particularly difficult to deal with and many have suffered adversely as a result.
Other family members and adoptive parents
The impacts of closed adoption don’t just affect those who are in the immediate ‘circle’ of adoption, but also other family members such as spouses, parents and children of those directly affected. Participants in the study expressed the lack of support options available to them in helping them better understand the issues associated with adoption that are being experienced by their loved ones, but also how they can best be of assistance to them.
Adoptive parents in the study were primarily focused on the needs of their adopted children, particularly with regard to access to records and family medical histories. The experiences of adoptive parents in relation to the process of adopting their children were largely positive, although many felt that there was little information provided to them regarding how to appropriately respond to their child’s desire to search for their family of origin.
Key needs and priority actions
The study revealed important areas where the majority of participants united in identifying the needs and priority actions for responding to the ways in which closed adoption has affected their lives. The service providers who participated in the study largely mirrored the views of people affected by past adoption experiences, including the need for:
- acknowledgement and recognition of past adoption practices (including the role of apologies and financial resources to address current service and support needs);
- raising community awareness of and education about past adoption practices and their subsequent effects;
- specialised workforce training and development for primary health carers, mental health and broader health and welfare professionals to appropriately respond to the needs of those affected;
- a review of the current search and contact service systems, with a commitment to develop improved service models;
- improved access to information through the joining of state and territory databases, governed by a single statutory body;
- improved access to and assistance with costs for mental, behavioural and physical health services; and
- ensuring that lessons from past adoption practices are learned from and translated where appropriate into current child welfare policies, and that adoption-specific services are created or enhanced to respond to the consequences of past practices.
To access the full report, see – Past Adoption Experiences: National Research Study on the Service Response to Past Adoption Practices
1. For the purposes of the report, the terms “mother” and “father” refer to biological parents.
Add a comment
Articles include: lessons from other sectors in screening for family violence; issues related to past adoption practices; incarcerated mothers
Identifying parental substance use and misuse in clinical practice; action research at the Hobart Family Relationships Centre; the late discovery
This short article discusses promising practices to help support contact between carers and birth families for children in permanent care.
This report considers alternative permanency options for children in out-of-home care, including simple open adoption.