Dr Kath McFarlane is Deputy Director of the Centre for Law and Justice, and Senior Lecturer in Law at Charles Sturt University.

We need to collect better data to improve our understanding of how vulnerable children in need become offenders, writes Dr Kath McFarlane.
This is the final in a series of short articles exploring why children and young people in out-of-home care or who have a history of maltreatment are over-represented in the youth justice system. This article focuses on the need for better data collection to inform how to best support children and young people in out-of-home care at risk of offending.
Children who are unable to live with their family for a period of time may, through an order of the Children’s Court, be placed in out-of-home care (OOHC) for periods ranging from a few weeks through to adulthood at age 18. This can be for a range of reasons, including abuse, neglect, parental drug and alcohol use, illness, domestic violence or poverty.
In order to better respond to the needs of children in OOHC, we need accurate and publically available disaggregated data to provide an in-depth understanding of their background, demographics, experiences and outcomes. This is particularly the case when considering the intersection between the OOHC and criminal justice systems.
Research has identified a correlation between placement in OOHC—as opposed to children ‘at risk’ or those involved with the child protection system—and involvement in the criminal justice system.
In New South Wales, for example, the OOHC cohort is over-represented:
The overlap between the OOHC and justice systems has also been shown to extend into early adulthood, with young Victorian care-leavers likely to have regular and negative contact with police.4 A number of recent government inquiries and reports have similarly identified the significance of criminalising practices undertaken by OOHC residential care agencies5 that exacerbate children’s involvement in the justice system. For example, police may be called to intervene when children exhibit challenging behaviour where this would not warrant a police response in a family home environment. Criminalisation can also occur when police are used to locate and return children missing from care, which can escalate tensions and result in criminal charges being laid.
While there are many standards and policies relating to the OOHC system,i none specifically address:
The invisibility of the issues affecting children in OOHC extend to the criminal justice organisations. Police services do not routinely record OOHC status at the time of arrest, nor have justice departments conducted research or implemented crime prevention programs that specifically target the OOHC population. Only the NSW corrections system has incorporated OOHC status into intake procedures at detention, however the data is yet to be analysed or publicly reported upon.
The collection of information on OOHC status represents an opportunity to understand how vulnerable children in need become offenders. This, in turn, would allow for strategies and programs to be put in place to break the care-crime nexus. Accurate and wide-sweeping demographic data is important in order to determine the criminogenic risks posed to children by OOHC systems designed to protect and provide for them.
While the Australian Government has focused attention on child protection and OOHC policy through the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children (2009–2020)7 and the National Standards for Out of Home Care8 to ‘deliver consistency and drive improvements in the quality of care’ provided to children in OOHC, there is scope for greater analysis of the intersection between OOHC and crime.
For example, the collection and collation of jurisdictional custodial data would permit national analysis that would, with the input of the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Institute of Criminology, inform national standards, policies and programs.9 Data collection should also include information regarding those involved in the OOHC and protection system in order to inform program development and policy, to alert authorities to their over-representation, and to understand their particular needs in custody.
Comprehending the factors that lead to children in OOHC becoming caught up in the justice system will assist agencies to adapt their practices to respond to children’s needs. A better understanding of their experiences of arrest, bail and sentencing will assist to identify effective programs, build community support, and ensure children’s and communities’ safety.
i. Standards and policies include the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children (2009–2020); the National Standards for Out of Home Care; various accreditation requirements; contractual benchmarks, guidelines and directions, as well as internal OOHC agency policies.
Feature image by Andrew Neel, CC0 1.0.
Dr Kath McFarlane is Deputy Director of the Centre for Law and Justice, and Senior Lecturer in Law at Charles Sturt University.
This article explores what’s known about the complex relationship between child maltreatment and youth offending.
Young people leaving care have specific needs and are at greater risk of contact with the justice system.
This article examines the role of homelessness in the link between child maltreatment and youth offending.
Examines Australian and international research to identify key areas of support that may help young people successfully transition from care
CFCA offers a free research and information helpdesk for child, family and community welfare practitioners, service providers, researchers and policy makers through the CFCA News.
Sign up to our email alert service for the latest news and updates
The Australian Institute of Family Studies acknowledges the traditional country throughout Australia on which we gather, live, work and stand.
We acknowledge all traditional custodians, their Elders past, present and emerging, and we pay our respects to their continuing connection to their culture, community, land, sea and rivers.
Add a comment