Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Skip to main content

Matching work and family commitments

Australian outcomes in a comparative perspective

 

You are in an archived section of the AIFS website 

 

This article summarises the main conclusions of the synthesis report of the OECD’s 2002–07 Babies and Bosses series, and also highlights how Australia compares with other OECD countries in terms of family policies and their outcomes. The report found that if parents have to choose between earning money and looking after their children, the result is that there would be too few babies and too little employment. Australia scores well in family spending and has a redistributive tax/benefit system, but its focus is largely on cash transfers rather than child and out-of-school-hours care. Policies aimed at sole parents have moved towards promoting self-sufficiency; nevertheless, there remain gaps in support. The report concludes that family policies in OECD countries are often not well integrated and indeed are sometimes in conflict, which leads to a waste of money and leaves the pursuit of a coherent family policy across the early life course a distant dream. This paper was presented in the Work and Family Panel session at the Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference in Melbourne, 9–11 July 2008.

You are in an archived section of the Australian Institute of Family Studies website. Articles in this issue of Family Matters are only available as PDF documents and do not meet the latest web accessibility standards. If you are unable to access any of the articles in this issue of Family Matters please contact us and we will endeavour to provide the article/s you need in a format that you can use.

 

Citation

 Adema, W., & Whiteford, P. (2008). Matching work and family commitments: Australian outcomes in a comparative perspective. Family Matters, 80, 9–16.

Share

Published

2 September 2008

Content type
Family Matters article
Download Family Matters article