Australian children in regional areas experience a 'tyranny of distance' from major cities, seen in somewhat poorer learning outcomes for children
The tyrannies of distance and disadvantage
There is a tyranny of distance or disadvantage but it depends on the outcome examined.
There were enduring differences in child cognitive outcomes by whether children live in major city areas compared to regional areas, even after a broad range of other factors are taken into account, indicating that there is a tyranny of distance for cognitive outcomes.
There was also a tyranny of disadvantage for child emotional or behavioural problems. The findings suggest that children living in disadvantaged areas experience greater emotional or behavioural problems, even when all other factors are taken into account.
Findings from the current study provide the first systematic national information on a broad range of child outcomes, as well as a large number of other variables that are known to shape children's development, which could vary depending on geographic locality or level of disadvantage.
This research report investigates whether children in regional areas experience a "tyranny of distance" or a "tyranny of disadvantage".
In other words, are the gaps in children's development in regional areas compared to children living in the major cities explained by their distance from the major cities (remoteness), or is it because many regional areas are disadvantaged compared to the cities?
The analyses make use of data from Growing up in Australia: The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) to report on differences in family demographic and economic characteristics, parent wellbeing and parenting style, family social capital and access to services, and children's educational activities, and to relate those differences to how children are developing. The study includes children aged from 0-1 up to 8-9 years old.
Authors and Acknowledgements
This paper uses unit record data from Growing Up in Australia: The Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. The study is conducted in a partnership between the Department of Social Services (DSS), the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The work was funded by the former Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA; now DSS). The findings and views reported in this paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to DSS, FaHCSIA, AIFS or the ABS.
The authors wish the thank colleagues at AIFS and DSS for valuable comments on earlier drafts of this report.
This work was commissioned and funded by the Australian Government the former Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (now Department of Social Services). Views expressed in this publication are those of individual authors and may not reflect those of the Australian Government or the Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Edwards, B., & Baxter, J. (2013). The tyrannies of distance and disadvantage: Factors related to childrens development in regional and disadvantaged areas of Australia (Research Report No. 25). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
This Facts Sheet describes how the characteristics of families differ between the "city" and the "country" or "bush"
This report works towards producing an evidence base concerning the efficacy of early childhood interventions in Australia
The focus of this Facts Sheet is on broad family trends. It was prepared to celebrate the 30th anniversary of research by AIFS.
Provides an overview of research on infants and young children who have experienced non-maternal and/or non-parental care.